Documents shed little light on Orleans Parish sheriff's $40 million ...

Lawyers for the Landrieu administration last week scoffed?at what they described as a $40 million request from Orleans Parish Sheriff Marlin Gusman to cover the initial costs of a consent decree aimed at fixing chronic problems at his troubled jail. In part, they said the sheriff failed to back up his numbers with an explanation of why so much money was needed.

Indeed, the 11-page document Gusman supplied to the city to bolster his request -- provided to The Times-Picayune in response to a public records request -- is less of an explanation than a collection of budget documents and financial spreadsheets. There is no effort to clarify the numbers or provide any context.

Gusman's documents portray the jail as deeply in the red. The first page shows a general breakdown of expenses for housing inmates and revenues from the city for 2011, with Gusman showing a gap of $14 million. The one-page breakdown doesn't explain how Gusman makes up for that deficit.

Deeper into the documents, he estimates he needs more than $6 million to raise deputy pay through 2013 to what is described as a "livable wage" and hire 72 deputies to replace those who have left since April. Other documents include an employee breakdown by jail facility and sheriff division, as well as a monthly breakdown of "medical expenditures."

A Gusman spokesman declined comment on the documents, saying the sheriff's office couldn't discuss them because they are part of ongoing litigation. In a written statement, Landrieu spokesman Ryan Berni said the city won't write Gusman a "blank check," asserting that for every million Gusman receives, 24 city workers would have to be furloughed for the rest of the year.

City representatives, including Landrieu himself and chief administrative officer Andy Kopplin, last week met with lawyers for the other parties and U.S. District Court Judge Lance Africk to talk about the status of talks. After that meeting, Africk indicated it will take time to resolve differences between the jail and city. He asked former Criminal District Court Judge Terry Alarcon to step in as a facilitator and set the next court date for Nov. 27.

Attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice and Southern Poverty Law Center, who are deeply engaged in the decree negotiations but not players in the funding fight, have described the disagreement as centered on "interim funding." That is defined as the amount Gusman needs "to address currently deficient conditions and begin implementing the settlement agreement in accordance with its timelines, without further delay," according to a recent filing by the two organizations.

The Justice Department and law center?attorneys had asked Africk to come up with a compromise figure, saying continued violence is putting inmates in jeopardy.

The framework for a 12-section consent decree has been worked out, the attorneys said. The decree would require a host of specific changes at the jail, trying to tackle many of the problems critics have complained about for years. These problems include persistent violence, inadequate mental health care and suicide prevention, and a general unsanitary environment for inmates.

But the court filings from the city and Gusman seem to illustrate how far apart the two sides remain on the critical financing issue. City attorneys said a forensic audit and staffing analysis is needed. They also questioned whether Gusman is properly managing the money he now receives.

"There has been no proof that any alleged unconstitutional conditions at the jail are the result of a lack of funding," city attorney Sharonda Williams wrote. "These statements are pure speculation at this point."

Furthermore, Williams called Gusman's analysis of his revenue situation incomplete. Gusman maintains it costs $41.7 million to care for inmates, compared to $26.4 million he receives from the city and another $785,000 raised by the jail commissary. But Williams said the sheriff left out certain revenue sources from his analysis, such as money raised by the sheriff's civil operations.

Williams also pointedly underscored Gusman's purchase of "a fleet of motorcycles," saying an audit can determine whether the sheriff is squandering money on non-essential items.

For his part, Gusman in his own motion last month laid much of the blame for problems at his facilities with the city, which is legally required to pay for the care of pre-trial inmates.

"Unfortunately, over the course of different city administrations, both before and during Sheriff Gusman's tenure as sheriff, their stances on appropriate funding for the prison have been mostly adversarial and often litigious," attorney T. Allen Usry wrote.

Usry noted that the sheriff's office spent years in a pitched federal court battle with the city, which years ago resulted in a settlement establishing the current daily payment of $22.39 for each inmate.

Both the Landrieu administration and Gusman have said they believe the "per diem" method of funding jail operations is outmoded and doesn't reflect the true cost of caring for inmates. But so far nothing has been done to change it.

"The consent decrees clearly reflect the city's acknowledgment of their obligation to fund the operation of the jail. Equally clear is that the current demands of the Justice Department require substantial additional funding," Usry wrote. "However, the city, when requested to supply this funding, declined to provide any funding."

Source: http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2012/10/sheriffs_explanation_of_orlean.html

kentucky derby beltane capitals john edwards conocophillips octomom dan savage

Voters In RI, Ore., Md. To Vote On Casinos ? CBS Baltimore

NEWPORT, R.I. (AP) ? The slot machines at Newport Grand chirp just like the ones in Vegas. The winners exult and the losers shrug just as they do in Atlantic City. But ask for the blackjack tables and you?ll be directed to a video game screen with a smiling, virtual dealer. The nearest table action is 50 miles away in Connecticut.

?Wouldn?t it be great to see a real person standing there?? asks Cathy Rayner, a Newport Grand employee and president of the union representing the 200 workers at the slot parlor in Rhode Island?s famed seaside resort. ?That could be a person earning good benefits.?

Rhode Island may soon grant her wish. Along with those in Oregon and Maryland, voters here will decide Nov. 6 whether to authorize an expansion of legal gambling in an increasingly cluttered and competitive market that now includes casinos, slot parlors or tribal facilities in 40 states.

Maryland is in the midst of a bruising battle over a proposal to authorize table games at its casinos, and to approve a new gambling facility close to Washington. Campaign spending for and against the ballot question is nearly $40 million, exceeding the amount spent in the state?s 2006 governor?s race. The proposal is being fought by a company that operates a casino in nearby West Virginia.

Las Vegas and Atlantic City once enjoyed a corner on the casino business until one state after another moved to welcome casinos, riverboat gambling or slot parlors. Despite a dip in gambling revenues during the Great Recession, states continue to place bets on expanded gambling.

Commercial casinos contributed nearly $8 billion to state and local governments in 2011, according to the American Gaming Association.

Ohio, Maryland, New York and Kansas have added casinos in the past two years. Massachusetts authorized casinos last year. Pennsylvania?s first casinos opened in 2006, and the state is now the nation?s second-largest gambling market after Las Vegas.

?It?s like a casino arms race where one state has slots, so the other state adds slots, then the first state adds a casino,? said David Schwartz, director of the Center for Gaming Research at the University of Nevada-Las Vegas. ?We?re running out of states that don?t have gambling. The question is whether there?s a saturation point. We?re going to find out because the market is going to tell us.?

There are signs that the push for more casinos may be ebbing, at least in some states.

A casino referendum in Oregon appears to be failing before the voters even weigh in. Last week two Canadian companies pushing plans to open Oregon?s first privately owned casino announced they would spend no additional money on their campaign, saying ?it appears ? not enough Oregon voters are ready to add a private casino to the state?s gaming options.?

Oregon already has several casinos operated by Indian tribes. The proposed casino would be located in the Portland metro area and would also include a hotel and waterpark. Its developers spent $5 million on campaign ads promising jobs and education funding. But the proposal was a long shot even before the state?s tribes opposed it: Two years ago a casino referendum won just 32 percent of the vote here.

Rhode Island has long resisted efforts to authorize casino games, though its two slot parlors contribute about $300 million a year to state coffers. Combined with state lottery proceeds, that?s the state?s third-largest source of revenue. Voters here last rejected a casino referendum in 2006, but supporters of this year?s push say times have changed.

Next-door Massachusetts authorized casinos this year, though none have yet opened. Twin River and Newport Grand say competition from those facilities will threaten their business and the revenue they create for the state.

Local and state leaders say expanded gambling could mean more jobs and economic activity for a state with 10.5 percent unemployment, the second-highest jobless rate in the nation. The ballot questions have the support of Gov. Lincoln Chafee and, importantly, Senate President Teresa Paiva Weed, a Newport Democrat and a one-time opponent of casinos.

Twin River and Newport Grand have spent more than $4.3 million on their campaigns for the ballot questions, which must pass statewide and in the host communities. Of that total, Twin River?s campaign organization had spent $3.9 million.

John Taylor Jr., chairman of the Twin River board of directors, said his facility stands to lose hundreds of jobs if the referendum fails, but could add hundreds if it?s approved. He said the slot parlor, just south of the Massachusetts line, could begin offering poker and blackjack as early as next summer if the ballot question is approved, giving it a significant head start over Massachusetts, where casinos are still years away from opening.

The rush to capitalize on gambling has critics warning that states are chasing after an increasingly small piece of the gambling pie ? and at the expense of bettors and their families.

?They keep saying `jobs, jobs, jobs,? but who is going to pay these salaries?? asked the Rev. Eugene McKenna, chairman of Citizens Concerned about Casino Gambling, a group opposing the ballot questions in Rhode Island. ?It?s not pennies from heaven. It?s hundreds of thousands of dollars from people who can?t afford to lose it.?

McKenna said a casino in Newport would forever alter the city now known for its historic seaside location, its Gilded Age mansions and upscale tourism.

To Diane Hurley, chief executive and co-owner of Newport Grand, the referendum is about keeping her family business afloat. Hurley?s father opened the facility nearly 40 years ago as a venue for jai alai. On a tour of the cavernous slot parlor she greets her employees and many patrons by name. She never asked for permission to offer table games, until the prospect of casinos in Massachusetts forced her to reconsider.

?Massachusetts kept threatening and threatening to do it, but then it became a reality and it wasn?t `maybe? anymore,? Hurley said.

(Copyright 2012 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)

Source: http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/10/21/voters-in-ri-ore-md-to-vote-on-casinos/

coachella 2012 lineup school delays joran van der sloot honey badger critics choice awards 2012 colbert president huntingtons disease

How to kill time without staring at your phone

19 hrs.

Once upon a time, standing around and waiting involved exactly that: Standing around, waiting, and not doing much else. Today, any free moment is spent facedown in a phone. Stop reading this on your own phone. Right now. Look around. At this moment, you should be the only person, anywhere in sight, not looking at a phone.

But staring at that phone isn't the only way to wait. You can do other stuff. In fact, there are exactly six things you can do instead.

Make eye contact
People used to do this all the time. You could recognize a neighbor or share a moment with an attractive stranger. It can still happen???but you have to be careful. You don't want to be caught staring right at the moment that person looks up from his (or especially her) phone. Wait until the fleeting few seconds when this person looks away from the phone for some reason, then casually lock eyes. Smile! It will seem a lot less weird that way. When you get back online, this kind of encounter is a great thing to put on Craigslist as a Missed Connection.

Talk about the weather
This is a classic. If you're new at it, try some established introductory phrases.

  • "This is some rain!"
  • "Hot enough for ya?"
  • "They say it's gonna turn cold tomorrow!"

For this to work, you'll need a little luck, because you have to find someone else who is also not looking at a phone. Otherwise, there's a data-filled weather app just a tap away. Not to mention that look:?Why are you talking to me, can't you see I'm looking at my phone?

Observe your surroundings
If you look up from your phone for long enough, you can notice amazing things happening all around you. A pigeon pecking at a pizza crust. A man pushing a shopping cart piled higher than his head. A grown woman weeping hysterically. That's real life! And it is stunning. Once you get back on your phone, all of these observations will make excellent tweets.

Find unusual patterns
This one is a bit of a brain teaser. Look over at that odd brick wall, or the hexagonal tile on the floor, or that way the ice cubes collect at the bottom of your glass. Gaze into these shapes. Watch them form new shapes. See the shapes begin to arrange themselves, rotating, and falling into position. So chaotic, yet so organized. You know what? This calls for a quick game of "Tetris."

See what other people are looking at on their phones
This is an endlessly fascinating sociological exercise, and it can also give you fresh ideas about what you could be doing on your own phone. A scouting report from a recent bus ride:

  • Shiny gold case. Hot pink case. iPhone 5, no case.
  • Cracked white iPhone 4 with an incoming call from "Daddy."
  • Bedazzled lady playing "Bedazzled."
  • Woman urgently speaking Spanish into a white Nokia with gold trim.
  • Girl on an HTC, reading Gawker, followed by "A Farmer's Market, Deep in China."

You could also just read a book
But then you're not even thinking about looking at your phone. You're looking at your Kindle.

This is what I do, anyway???how do you kill time phone-free?

More from Gizmodo:

Opening photo: Four guys who really know how to look at phones. From left:?Jesus Diaz,?Matt Buchanan,?Sam Biddle, and?Matt Hardigree. Shot by?John Mahoney.

Source: http://www.nbcnews.com/technology/gadgetbox/how-kill-time-without-staring-your-phone-1C6583331

andy cohen andy cohen mozambique oosthuizen great expectations jake owen oosthuizen louis

Jake Chessum Interview

Jake Chessum is a photographer you will find near the top of all photo editor lists and that?s why I?m so excited he will be joining me Fri, Oct 26, 2012 from 1:30 PM to 3:30 PM for a panel discussion on ?Making a Career in Editorial Photography? at the Photo Plus Expo in NYC. I had the opportunity recently to sit down with him at his studio and discuss his career.

APE: Let?s start at the beginning. When did you first get interested in photography?

Jake Chessum: I was 17 years old and I went to see an exhibition by the British photographer John French. I clearly remember going home and saying to my mum, ?I want to a photographer.? I had been taking my own pictures for about a year before that, but this was the first time I clearly remember deciding on a career.

But before that, my dad worked for this company that would hire photographers and he used to work with this guy, Chris Morris. This guy always seemed glamorous. He had a sports car and he lived in Holland Park, which is super fancy West London.

Because of this my dad had access to photography. He?d always had an old Pentax 35mm camera when we went on family holidays, and he would shoot black and white and come home with enlarged 16 by 20 contact sheets and massive fiber based prints of all our holiday snaps and our personal photos. This was from when I was about 6 or 7 years old onwards.

APE: You?re kidding. He would make enlarged contact sheets? Why would he do that?

Jake: He enjoyed taking pictures, and because he could. He worked for Wates, which was a home building company and they had a photography budget to shoot an internal magazine, and pictures of the new developments.

APE: So, he?d take in the vacation film as well?

Jake: They were really good photographs. And it was mostly black and white. That?s what probably sparked it. I liked to see prints and see photography.

At the time I was at an all boys private school in Croydon where art wasn?t considered a career path, but when I was 16 I moved to another school where art education was taken more seriously. There were a couple of art teachers there who were really enthusiastic and really encouraging and made it seem like it was a real proposition to make a career out of it. They?d been to art school in Central London.

APE: So, you decided to go to art school in London?

Jake: There was an art school in our town but it was rubbish so we all realized that we didn?t want to go there, so had to put a terrible portfolio in or concoct an excuse why you had to go to one of the London art schools.

APE: How does that work? I don?t understand. Do you automatically get to go to school?

Jake: No your portfolio had to be accepted.

APE: So you would give the local school a crap portfolio?

Jake: That is what the smart people did but I went by the rules. I put in a good portfolio and got in but then I wrote to the local council and explained that they didn?t have a good textile department and I wanted to be a textile designer and this school was not going to give me the opportunities. Miraculously they believed me, as it was a lie. So I was able to attend The Central School of Art and Design (now Central St. Martins) for my Foundation Course.

APE: Did you know that you had a talent for photography? Was it evident then?

Jake: I guess. A decent part of my portfolio was photography. I did this project where I went day and night taking photographs on Chelsea Bridge, and I showed this work to my tutor and she told me, it?s very difficult to define what makes a good photograph, but you know what it is, you can do it. And I thought wow, really? [laughs]

That was ?86 and I remember I started buying The Face and Vogue when I was 16, because I was really into magazine design. So, when it came to choosing a degree, I?d looked at photography courses, but they were all kind of ridiculous, because to make it a valid educational qualification, they had to give it this kind of bogus scientific basis or some kind of quantifiable, gradable quality.

It was all based on technique and technical stuff, and I knew I wasn?t particularly interested in that side of it. I was more interested in the images, making the images. I didn?t really care to be graded on black-and-white printing or that aspect of it. So, I thought the next best thing was the graphic design course at St. Martin?s which had a photography unit, so that?s what I went for.

APE: So, you went into graphic design.

Jake: Yes, I did a graphic design degree kind of knowing that I wanted to do photography. But the great thing about St. Martin?s at that time was it was kind of a free-for-all, do you know what I mean? After the first year I was really unhappy because I was following the course, trying to do the projects and failing miserably. But by the second year a couple of friends and I worked out that if we just went down to the basement darkroom and printed, no one would bother us.

APE: [laughs]

Jake: I mean, it was very vague. They would set a project, and you would either do it or not, and I decided not to [laughs].

APE: But, if you didn?t do the project didn?t you fail?

Jake: You didn?t really get into trouble. I don?t know how I didn?t get into trouble, really. But everything was judged on the end of year show, and I always had a lot of work to show. At my second year show I put up photographs and some type designs. One of my fellow students, Graham Wood (now of Tomato) told me he thought I should ditch the typography and stick to photography. Good advice.

But it was definitely laissez-faire. And I remember people thought that I didn?t do any work all year, but it was because they never saw me because I was in the darkroom all year. I was just standing in the darkroom after taking pictures of whatever on the street, or portraits. I cast a few people in the school that I?d seen around just to try and just get together a portfolio. I also did tests with models as St. Martin?s was in Covent Garden where all the model agencies were.

APE: So school gave you an opportunity to just take pictures?

Jake: It was an amazing time. Now I?ll get calls from people once in awhile saying ?What should I do, Should I stay in college or should I get a job?? It?s difficult to advise them to do what I did, because college was free then. I left college in London with a debt of 800 pounds. It?s nothing. So for me?

APE: And three years of taking pictures?

Jake: Yeah, three years of freedom and it was free. It was paid for by the government.

APE: Amazing. That still happens?

Jake: No, now I think you have to pay 9,000 pounds a year. But even that?s nothing compared to here in America.

APE: Do they produce a lot of photographers, is your country just swarming with photographers?

Jake: No, no, and again, it was so long ago, this is 1990 and there were a lot of magazines, like the Face, Arena, ID and Blitz. They had no budget and they attracted up and coming people who were willing to work for pictures because they gave you creative freedom.

APE: Right.

Jake: It was a great era. There we so many photographers starting out at that time who are still really successful: Craig McDean, Richard Burbridge, Glen Luchford, David Sims, Juergen Teller, the late Corrine Day. It was an amazing era to be a young photographer shooting in London. It really was a very creative period.

APE: Tell me about your first job?

Jake: I put together a degree show in June of 1990 but I had worked for a few people before that because St. Martin?s was in the center of London and there were a lot of people who had studied there and had good jobs so they would come back and throw a couple of bones to the kids at school.

So I did a few shoots for short-lived magazines. Actually, the day the degree show opened, Phil Bicker gave me my first ?real? job for The Face, which was to take a train to Macclesfield, which is a kind of grim, northern town and take a picture of a young rapper. I had to get up there as early as possible, shoot the picture and come back to London for the opening of the degree show. I went on my own with a borrowed Pentax 6?7, a 90mm lens, a 135mm lens, a homemade reflector and a few rolls of tri-x.

And The Face actually wrote a piece about me. They did a double-page spread about six graduates from London art schools and they featured me. Which at the time I was completely blase about. Which is funny because now I?d be super-psyched

APE: So, that was your first job. You graduated from school, got a job and got written up.

Jake: And then I?d go and see people with my portfolio, and I got a few calls from that for jobs. And basically, for the first two years I was green as hell. I didn?t know what I was doing. I didn?t know how to run a business, we never had any lessons on running a business, invoicing, nothing.

APE: You just spent all your time in the darkroom.

Jake: Yes, so suddenly you?re like, shit, what do I do? But the amazing thing was, suddenly someone?s saying, oh, can you do this job, it?s 400 pounds a day. That?s still decent money, do you know what I mean?

APE: That was a ton of money for you at the time.

Jake: Then I scored my first ad job off the back of my show, which is bizarre. I got a job for Neutrogena shooting four ads.

APE: Why would they pick somebody who just graduated?

Jake: God bless them, I?ve got no idea. I mean, I think they wanted to use a young photographer. They?d got in a load of books and they got me to do it, and paid me 1500 pounds a day.

APE: Was your work that good back then? If you looked at it now, would you think, OK, there?s some good stuff in there?

Jake: Yes, there are some good pictures. But I didn?t know what I was doing?

APE: As far as running a business?

Jake: Yes, exactly. And running a set, dealing with hair and make up artists, stylists, clients?

APE: You just knew the picture part.

Jake: I?d done a bunch of nudes and portraits of friends, and they were all natural light. But, Jesus. [laughs] I wouldn?t have hired me. I was 23 and green as hell, but I was very enthusiastic.

APE: That was big money.

Jake: Yes, it was 1500 pounds a day for four days at a time when I?d never earned anything. But the funny thing was, they kept saying, we want to do really natural girls, we don?t want these supermodels. So, we did the casting and we cast a 16 year old Kate Moss.

APE: [laughs] No way. That was your first ad job? Kate Moss. Ok, I think there?s some stars aligned for you.

Jake: Yes, maybe.

APE: Something?s going on.

Jake: She was so amazing, she was so charismatic and beautiful. And I remember the casting, because I?d met her like, three or four times. She lived in Croydon where I lived, so I?d bump into her on the train once in a while, although I?m absolutely certain she has no recollection of this. I remember talking to her on the tube platform at Victoria Station one day, I bumped into her and she said, ?I?m sick of this, I?m going to give up, I?m getting nowhere,? which is deeply ironic.

So, at the casting, she came in and saw me and said hello and came over and kissed me on the cheek. And the art director?s like, ?Who?s that girl, how do you know that girl? She?s amazing, how do you know her?? She was obviously something pretty amazing.

So I did that and I was a living at home so I had no rent to pay and I think in my first year I made 25,000 quid, so for the first year out of college, that?s not bad 20 years ago.

APE: What?s that in US dollars?

Jake: $40,000.00

Another big break was in December of 1990. I got a call from Dylan Jones who was the editor of Arena. He said, ?Do you want to shoot Gary Oldman?? I was like ?yeah? until I found out it was at a restaurant and it was lunch with Gary Oldman. He would be sitting there eating his lunch being interviewed.

I said, ?Oh, all right, yeah, yeah.? It?s tough. At a restaurant. I didn?t know how to use light or anything. I had no system. So I turned up at this job to meet Gary at the restaurant.

I was first there, and when he walked in I introduced myself: ?Hey Gary, I?m Jake. I?m here to take your picture.? He said, ?What do you mean? They didn?t tell me there was a photographer. I was like, ?Oh, OK.? I said, ?OK, I totally understand. Can I just tell you something? I just left college three months ago. This is one of my first jobs, and I know that they told me they want to put you on the cover, but they don?t have a cover shoot. Will you do a cover shoot with me?? He said, ?Yeah, call me next week. Come to my flat and we?ll do it. I?ll give you half an hour.?

APE: You talked him into it?

Jake: Yeah. I met him in Chelsea. It was a shitty day. I took my friend, not an assistant and we put a piece of white cardboard up on a children?s playground in Chelsea. No groomer, no stylist, shot a head shot of Gary Oldman, and they put it on the cover. [laughs]

APE: Amazing.

Jake: That was a huge deal for me, first of all that I talked him into it, second that he was an actor who I thought was fantastic. I loved ?Sid and Nancy? and ?Prick Up Your Ears? and it was the cover of Arena. The main magazines I wanted to work for at the time were Face and Arena.

APE: That?s great. You never assisted anyone?

Jake: I did one day with Kevin Davies. He said to me, ?Why do you want to do this? You are already shooting.? I remember, I assisted him on a test and I had to go to do a job in the afternoon so I had to leave to shoot Gabriel Byrne [laughs]. But he was cool about it.

APE: One day of assisting your entire career?

Jake: Yeah, that was it. I went to see another photographer who was well known and I remember, I said, can I assist you? He said, ?Fuck off, you?re a rival now.? Those are his exact words to me.

APE: [laughs]

Jake: I?d done one job so I didn?t consider myself a rival. I thought he was amazing.

APE: You?ve probably met a lot of assistants and young aspiring photographers who go to school here. It?s completely different.

Jake: I dread to think what it?s like now to try and start. It must be so hard.

APE: Do you feel like back then the industry was tighter?

Jake: London was kind of small. I think there were a group of magazines that were looking at younger photographers and I think the fact that there weren?t that many photo studios and everybody used to shoot at Click Studios meant there was a sort of camaraderie.

I remember hanging out in the office at Click and Glen Luchford was there and he said, ?I sent in one print.? and I was like ?What do you mean one print?? I would send in the whole shoot. I had no idea that you should send in an edit. I was completely clueless. I thought, ?What are you talking about? That?s ridiculous. How arrogant to suppose that you know more than the art director?. But of course he was right.

APE: So you just picked up little pieces here and there. How to run your business and how to do an edit?

Jake: Yeah, it was a very gradual process. I think in those first few years I was very fortunate that I got to shoot a lot of people who were about to become very famous. Quentin Tarantino, Beck, kd lang, Tricky, for example. So I quite quickly had a celebrity book going. Being trusted to shoot big names, and getting publicist approval is a huge hurdle to jump for any new photographer. But there was also a time where I would shoot anything that was offered to me. I was shooting some terrible pictures, and taking terrible commissions. Because first of all, I didn?t know how to say no. I didn?t have a cell phone and there was no email. If they called you and you picked up the phone?

APE: You had to have an excuse if you didn?t want to shoot.

Jake: Yeah, it was really hard to say no, plus the money was good. I was happy to be asked to do stuff. After a couple of years, I had a conversation with somebody at Arena. I think it was one of the fashion editors I worked with on a job. She?s said, ?Why are you doing all these shit jobs, because you?re watering down what you?re good at.?

Then I got to know Grant Scott, who was a great mentor to me, and the Art Director at British Elle. I went into see him after I?d been working maybe two years. He said, ?You?re at the point now you?ve got to decide. Do you want to be a working photographer or a good photographer? A working photographer does what they?re offered, a good photographer picks and chooses.?

That was a real big moment for me, because I was only 25.

APE: Then you start turning down jobs?

Jake: Literally that week, I had accepted a job shooting some corny feature for a Women?s magazine, about women who have affairs with their personal trainers or something. The guy called me to talk about the shoot and I said, ?Look, I can?t do that job for you.? I had to make a decision and not do this shit anymore, and stick to it. So I said no to that. It was the end of 1992. The economy went to shit and literally I didn?t work for six months. [laughs]

APE: Oh my God. Did you freak out?

Jake: Yeah, I was really freaked out.

APE: You were thinking that was horrible advice.

Jake: No, I thought it was good advice but I was still freaking out.

APE: You didn?t know if you could make a career turning down bad jobs.

Jake: Yeah, yeah.

APE: So what happened? Six months, hardly any work?

Jake: I was making like three, four hundred a month.

APE: Still living at home?

Jake: Yeah, I was fortunate to be still living at home, thank God. Gradually it started to pick up again and I found new routes into different clients, being a bit more picky.

Then Lee Swillingham became art director at The Face and he started to call me fairly regularly to shoot portraits.

In late 93 he called and said, ?Do you want to go to the worst area of Los Angeles to shoot Ice Cube?? ?Yes.? [laughs] I had been to America twice on holiday. Suddenly I was flying to LA to shoot Ice Cube. I went with the writer to South Central and we had a 20-minute shoot with Ice Cube on the street.

APE: How was it?

Jake: It was incredible. I?d never been to L.A. and we sat with him and he kind of started doing the hip-hop gangster poses. And I said, oh no, I don?t really want to do that, can we do something a bit more?And he went, ?you mean, a bit more reflective.? I was like, yes, exactly. So, he sat on the curb and he just hung out.

APE: And you made great pictures.

Jake: Yes, they were good pictures, and then about three or four months later they asked me to shoot The Beastie Boys again in L.A., so I went out with a writer and we went to Mike D?s house. And actually, that?s one of the pictures [pointing to a picture on the studio wall] and that?s the print that The Face ran. I think in that period I shot for The Face literally every month for about three years.

APE: You already have your style here. It?s in that picture.

Jake: I guess it?s a kind of very loose, not overly directed. You kind of work with them just to let their personality do the talking. And they were really funny guys. They were into it, just pissing around for an hour or two.

APE: So, you just kind of fell into that style?

Jake: I think, yes.

APE: It just happened, there was nothing planned about it?

Jake: In the beginning I would look at a book of photographs I liked the night before a shoot, going, what am I going to do, what am I going to do? But that didn?t really work on the day, as all my preconceived ideas went out the window. So I just think, not consciously, that I would go in and suss out the location, then meet and chat to who I was shooting and see where it went. But I talk too much and I?d start talking and kind of see what happens; try and get into a situation where something might happen.

APE: You talk too much, that?s part of your style.

Jake: That?s funny you should say that, because my wife just said, oh, you?re doing the interview today, don?t ramble.

APE: [laughs]

Jake: You know, I just talk and talk and talk.

APE: Every single shoot?

Jake: Yes, if they respond. [laughs]

APE: What happens if they don?t?

Jake: It?s harder. I mean, you can work in silence, but it?s easier if they respond or start talking back. But I remember reading a David Bailey quote where he said he maintained a constant stream of encouragement and I think I do try to do that.

APE: I?ve never been on set with you, but now your pictures make a lot more sense now that you say that. Is that nervous energy, the talking?

Jake: When I do a shoot, the hour before the shoot is the worst hour of my life. I don?t want to be there. I want to go home. I?ll do anything to be on the other side of it. So I think it?s partly nervous energy.

Then suddenly you?re confronted with for example Robert De Niro. He?s walking into the room and you?ve got to do something to get the shot. I?ve shot him a couple of times. It?s intimidating.

APE: He?s not a talkative guy?

Jake: He?s not a very talkative guy.

APE: You?re just talking to him the whole time?

Jake: Talking at him. I?m trying to get something out of him. But what I?ve realized with he doesn?t want to hear how great of an actor he is. He knows how fucking good of an actor he is like all these guys. You don?t want to go in there ? although it?s difficult sometimes if you?re a fan ? and say, ?Oh my god. I love you.? But I think the bigger the star, the smaller the talk. Talk about the weather, or what movie you saw last night, or what you?re doing for the holidays.

APE: You?ve done this for a long time but when you started, did you have some things in your head that you knew you were going to talk about? Or do you just read the newspaper and you know what?s going on?

Jake: Sometimes it?s just current affairs. If they talked to the editor or stylist beforehand, you just gauge what they were talking about and what their level of interest is, how talkative they are. Often I ask the PR, ?What?s a good thing to talk about? What does he not want to talk about??

I don?t overly research the people I?m shooting, but obviously I?ll read and find out something.

It?s funny. Since I?ve had kids, I talk endlessly about them. I?m boring. I?m the fucking worst dad bore. I love talking about other people?s kids because it?s a human thing. It?s not about work.

APE: So if they have kids, you?re talking about kids for hours?

Jake: And then if they want to talk about their kids, I love to hear about what their kids do and we can compare notes.

I say, ?What have you got?? And they say, ?I?ve got two girls.?

?How old are they??

?13 and 17.?

I?m like, ?Oh my god. I?ve got two girls. They?re seven and ten.? And they?re like, ?Oh geez. You?re in trouble.?

If they?re willing to be personal, great. If they?re not?

APE: Does that make better pictures or does it matter?

Jake: I don?t think it really matters. I think it makes the session easier. I shot a big job last week for Sony, and I was editing with the client and he said to me that he noticed as the shoot went on, I just wear them down. You just keep going and talking until they drop and give in, which I had never analyzed as a reality.

APE: That always happens? Do you get your best pictures after you?ve worn them down? They don?t happen at the beginning of the shoot? Is that pretty common with you?

Jake: Sometimes at the beginning of the shoot and sometimes it?s five minutes from the end of the shoot. I haven?t really looked at the flow. But sometimes the shoot is only minutes long, so there?s not much time.

APE: That was just something that occurred to you recently?

Jake: It occurred to me that it was a possibility, but I hadn?t really thought about it until this guy said it last week. Maybe it?s true. I don?t know.

APE: We?ve jumped ahead to your style which I really like. I want to talk more about it, but how do you get from London to here?

Jake: I started coming out here to work and then I had two friends who lived in the West Village. They?re from England. They?d gone out to get jobs in New York and so I started coming out and staying with them to do appointments, to try and get work here with varying degrees of success because it was really hard as a foreigner. You come into this new market and you?re all excited. ?I?m going to get loads of work.? And of course you go back to London and they forget about you immediately. This was in 1995. It was pre-Internet and pre-email.

I think the big break was when I had been coming and going for a year or two and then Matt Berman and John Kennedy Jr. started ?George? magazine. Matt Berman was his creative director. He hired Bridget Cox, who was his photo director and then Matt and Bridget picked up every English magazine. They went through The Face, ID and Arena with a fine toothed comb and picked the photographers from England that they wanted to work with.

APE: Why would they pick only photographers in England?

Jake: I don?t know. It was just a thing. I think they thought it would maybe bring in a sensibility and those magazines were at their peak. They used American photographers as well. Of course there are really good photographers here, but they decided to get a little school of London based photographers they?d fly out to shoot.

APE: They?d fly you into the States?

Jake: It was incredible. Before the magazine launched, Matt called me up and said, ?Do you want to come out and shoot for us?? He flew me out. I stayed with friends. In fact, they may have put me in a hotel for the week. I hung out with Matt in his office and we?d shoot the shit, chat about photography, design, art. He?s a great guy.

And then he sent me to Colorado to shoot a senator. I shot some portraits in New York and then I flew back to London. And then he?d fly me out again. I did Kofi Annan. Newt Gingrich with a lion. I did a bunch of people. They did these themed issues. I did like the ten top men in politics or something like that. They?d fly me all over the country and it was a real education.

So suddenly I was getting a ton of shoots here and I was getting a bit more exposure. And gradually over the period from the beginning of 1996 to 1999, I came here more and more until I was here for three or four months a year. I was picking up interesting portraits in London for magazines like W, and I got a great break when Kathy Ryan at The New York Times Magazine hired me to shoot a cover of Tom Hanks and Ben Affleck. I shot a series of covers for them from 1998 onwards. It was starting to get stupid because I was constantly away. I would literally get home, get a phone call and get back on an airplane. It wasn?t making my personal life particularly easy.

My wife and I had been talking about moving to New York so in the middle of 1998 we thought, ?Fuck it. We?ll move to New York.? She?s a really talented designer and got a job working for The Gap. We got married on March 27, 1999. We went to Saint Lucia for a week for our honeymoon we flew back on the third of April and on the fourth of April, we moved to New York.

APE: Big life change.

Jake: We literally left everything.

APE: You felt you needed to move to New York to have a successful career?

Jake: I think my experience in being here and then going back and not getting any phone calls was like that Andy Warhol saying, ?Success is a job in New York.? And I thought that was where it was at and if I wanted to shoot big names for big clients that is where I needed to be. I wasn?t a fashion photographer. I wasn?t a product photographer or a car photographer and in England that?s a big market. I wasn?t particularly technical and a lot of the advertising imagery in the UK was very precise and that?s not me. I thought there was a lot of personality based stuff for me to shoot here.

And it was financial. My first big job in New York was in the end of 1998. I got a big job for IBM where we shot here, in London and in Tokyo. It was just before we moved. I got that ad job which paid a lot.

APE: So you saw that most of your potential clients were here.

Jake: It was a leap of faith. It was partly financial, but partly opportunity. All the celebs are here. If you shot a celeb in London, it was in a hotel room for 20 minutes on a press junket.

One of the first jobs I did here after moving and I suddenly thought, ?OK. This is working out.? It was for Nancy Iacoi at ?Premiere? who called me and asked me to shoot Johnny Depp for a cover, so we flew out to Frank Lloyd Wright House in LA. Now, that?s a shoot. [laughs]

APE: That?s an amazing shoot.

Jake: It?s not 20 minutes tucked in somewhere. It was amazing to suddenly be here doing all that stuff.

APE: And you were shooting big time editorials, shooting for tons of magazines?

Jake: I was shooting for ?The New York Times Magazine?, ?Premiere,? ?Newsweek,? ?Esquire,? ?Entertainment Weekly?, ?Details? a lot of editorial.

APE: I want to get into the promo stuff and the custom portfolio books because these are really interesting. Let?s get into these books. When did you first start making the books?

Jake: ?97 was the first one.

APE: Describe the process. Why did you start making them like this with the color photocopies?

Jake: When I started working for foreign magazines from London, it was pre-email, pre-Internet. You would FedEx off the edit, so I was cutting out these pictures realizing that as I didn?t have two sets of contacts necessarily, that I would never see them again, and to have a record of what the hell I had sent them I made color copies and they were sitting around in a pile.

Then I said, ?Hmm. I?ll stick them in a book.? So I started cutting them out and making these collages and arrangements which I think because I?d been to art school and done a lot of painting, drawing stuff that it was second nature to have a sketch book. It was kind of the first photographic manifestation of a sketchbook.

And within a few weeks, I started to get a thick little set of pictures. There were pages and pages of this stuff. I had always been frustrated with my portfolios because they were one or two prints from each sessions and it didn?t really reflect the shoot.

APE: You wanted to show the whole take?

Jake: Yes because I was confident at this point. It was following off my conversation with Grant Scott who said, ?Do you want to be a working photographer or a good photographer?? He showed me a shoot that one of the guys who worked he?d with, I can?t remember who it was, had done with Antonio Banderas and this guy had everything. He had close ups, wide shots, back and white, color, different outfits.

And he said, ?How long do you think they had to do this shoot?? I said, ?It looks like all day.? And he said, ?No. They had two hours.? He said, ?You?ve got to cover more than one shot because what if you submit a color headshot and the magazine has already got 20 color headshots in this issue and they want a black and white wide shot? You?ve got to think about that.?

And I had never considered it. I was too dumb. This was early on in my career. I was like, ?Shit. He?s absolutely right.? So I started shooting around and trying really to explore and shoot how he told me to, for him particularly. So I had all these shots that never saw the light of day.

APE: And that is also a signature thing for you is how many setups you do.

Jake: I guess it became that way just trying to give a variety.

APE: And is part of that you just wearing them out? Or are you just trying to find something?

Jake: It?s like, ?I?ve got that. Let?s do something different.? I?m always thinking that there?s a better shot here that I haven?t seen yet.

APE: Back to the books.

Jake: I?d put these together and suddenly it became a tool. Not just for reviewing the work but for getting work. Art directors seemed to respond very well to it. They loved to see the variety, to see the outtakes, to feel it?s something that?s personal, which it is.

APE: It?s very unusual. I don?t think I know anyone who does it this way but again it just fits with your personality so well. And you did it out of necessity.

Jake: Yes. I had wound up the first one and then I think ? ?We need two of these,? so I?d do two. It got to a point where I think on one round we did six of them. It took weeks. It?s really labor intensive.

APE: And you?ve done one of these every year.

Jake: Yeah, pretty much.

APE: It?s amazing. That?s amazing just to have that record of your career.

Jake: It?s a good review. It?s good to look back just to try and find stuff. I?ve got a client that I am about to shoot for, and they?re looking for pictures of night views of cities so I just went through them last night and pulled out a couple. It?s good to review and find stuff.

APE: Night views of cities?

Jake: Yeah, it?s for a vodka client.

APE: Oh, to go in with your other shots?

Jake: Yes, so that we don?t have to shoot it because we?ve only got two days to shoot this thing.

APE: What about as far as promos and stuff? Did you just do the normal kind of promo cards?

Jake: Yeah, I did promo cards, although I think they?re of somewhat limited value. But, you?d hope to go into someone?s office and see one pinned up on the wall.

APE: [laughs]

Jake: It was brutal back then. It?s so much easier now to get pictures out there because you either have a website, blog, or send them in an email and people are hopefully interested to get them.

APE: Right. Yeah, let?s talk about that next, that evolution into The Daily Chessum. It makes a lot more sense to me now, meeting you and seeing and remembering the proliferation of images that you produce. Doing something daily, that makes a lot of sense now.

Jake: There are a hundred pages in each of these books. So that became an end in itself and a promotional tool that came out of nowhere and seemed to pay off. But then getting a website took a while and once you?ve got it up and running it?s hard to update, it takes a real commitment. I was talking to my agent and she was saying ?Maybe you should do a blog.? I thought ?Yeah, that?s great, but no writing.?

APE: [laughs]

Jake: I?m not disparaging any blogs where people write about their experiences, but I didn?t want to do that. I didn?t want to demystify the process. There?s a lot of stuff out there that you shouldn?t tell anybody. You know what I mean?

APE: Yeah. If you want to reach photo editors and art directors and art buyers, then you need to be showing pictures and not talking about the process.

Jake: Yeah as a consumer of some of those blogs, it?s interesting to read that stuff because it creates a kind of kinship and it?s good to know you?re not the only one dealing with that crap. But yeah, I don?t want to divulge that information. I just wanted to put pictures out there regularly to show what I was up to. It?s easy to do, look at, immediate. It?s my visual diary.

APE: It?s just another promotional vehicle.

Jake: Yes, and I was really happy that Tumblr sent me a little email saying, oh, we love your blog, we want to put it on our spotlight page. Which overnight, I went from, 500 followers to like, 3,000, and then the next month it was 5,000, and up to 22,000 followers.

APE: I talked to you a year or longer ago about it, and you were saying ?I don?t know where this is going to go, but I feel like I need to participate.?

Jake: Yes.

APE: And you said you?re making a mistake not trying some of these new tools out.

Jake; True, and I?m not an innovator in that sense because I waited so long to jump on the blog bandwagon.

APE: No, but you took the time to see all the other blogs and make a decision, how you wanted yours to work.

Jake: Yes, and I thought, if you don?t update, you lose traffic so, I thought every day I?d put up one image, because putting up more would be a sheer burden to come up with more good pictures. Do you know what I mean? I didn?t want to dip into the archive too much. I wanted it to be something current. I want it to reflect what I was up to within that time frame. And obviously, it?s a kind of a cheat, because when you know you?re going to be busy, I queue up my 10 ahead or sometimes 20 ahead if I know I?m going to be crazed.

APE: And it?ll do it automatically.

Jake: Yes, it updates once a day, every day.

APE: Right, that?s perfect.

Jake: And then yesterday I got a bunch of PDFs of something that just came out, so I pushed everything back a few days and dropped those in to come in sooner.

APE: And, the other thing that you told me was with your shoots there?s all these outtakes that don?t make it in the magazine.

Jake: You have to be careful with that because you can diminish the value of the outtakes. Or upset a publicist. Clients want to pay for exclusives.

APE: Well, I think it?s brilliant.

Jake: Thanks. But, yes, it?s just a really cool way of making you work as well and making you take pictures. If you haven?t shot a job for a couple of days and you need to post, then it?s time to go out and shoot some pictures.

APE: I want to talk just really quick about the transition to digital. Obviously, you?re not shooting very much film anymore.

Jake: No.

APE: But then you were saying how much you like digital.

Jake: Yes, I?m psyched about it.

APE: When did you finally embrace?

Jake: I haven?t shot an ad job on film for five years. And I haven?t seen a reason why I would have to. So in the last four years.

APE: Once you embraced it you felt like, ?This is amazing.?

Jake: It?s like a revelation. I?d read yesterday some photographer who went fully digital in 2001. I went, ?Fucking hell. That was pretty early to really go 100 percent digital.?

APE: Some people don?t love the film and the printing. They never got into that. Obviously all that time in the darkroom, you love that process.

Jake: Years of printing black and white and processing film. Seeing it, holding it up in the darkroom for the first time. There?s a huge thrill. There always was in seeing the print come up, and actually going through the craft of washing it, drying it. All that stuff.

Letting that go took a while. But I think I went through a transitional period. I had a darkroom in London, but I never had one here, and as I got busier I let it go. I was also shooting a lot of color and I never printed my own color. Plus the printers I used were better at it than I was. But I?ll admit I was one of those sanctimonious douchebags back in the day who was like, ?Oh my God, they never print. How can you call yourself a photographer? How disgusting.? When I had the kids, I didn?t want to spend a night in the darkroom. I wanted to go home.

APE: What was the revelation once you really got into it?

Jake: I had let control go to an extent with the printing and retouching when I was all film. But when I started shooting digital I felt I claimed it back. Getting the images to where I wanted them, even something as simple as making something black and white, felt like giving me a creative outlet within the medium that I kind of lost track of. I?d let that go for a bit and it was a revelation to get it back. Do you know what I mean?

APE: Yeah. I think that completes the circle. Thanks for your time.

Jake: No problem.

by A Photo Editor on October 22, 2012 ? 2 comments


Source: http://www.aphotoeditor.com/2012/10/22/jake-chessum-interview/

betty white ed reed football schedule jo paterno dead south carolina tuskegee airmen mike james

Hanne B. Mawhinney: UCEA EC 2012 Candidate Interview 10/22 by ...

  • Loading

    On his show, Comedian Rodney Perry covers arts and entertainment, everything from comedy and politics to music and acting, with his signature comedic slant.

  • MashUp Radio is a 30-minute podcast that discusses the fusion of technology, life, culture and science. Host Peter Biddle, engineer and executive for Intel?s Atom Software, dishes up a thought-provoking discussion.

  • Deepak Chopra Radio provides an online forum for compelling and thought provoking conversations on success, love, sexuality and relationships, well-being and spirituality.

  • The Bottom Line Sports Show is hosted by former NBA stars Penny Hardaway, Charles Oakley, Mateen Cleaves. Tune in to get the inside scoop on what's happening in sports today.

  • Joy Keys provides her listeners with insight to improve their lives mentally, physically, monetarily and emotionally. Past guests on the show have included Meshell Nedegeocello, Blair Underwood, in addition to an impressive list of CEOs, humanitarians and authors.

  • Hits Radio covers basketball, sports culture and entertainment with past guests including Jason Kidd, Robin Lundberg and Chris Herren.

  • Listeners get an earful on The Halli Casser-Jayne Show, Talk Radio for Fine Minds. Whether it?s the current political cocktail or the latest must-read award-winning book, Halli tackles all topics and likes to stir ? and sometimes shakes ? things up.

  • Award-winning World Footprints is a leading voice in socially responsible travel and lifestyle. Hosts Ian & Tonya celebrate culture and heritage and bring a unique voice to the world of travel.

  • Football Reporters Online is a group of veteran football experts in the fields of coaching, scouting, talent evaluation, and writing/broadcasting/media placement. Combined, the group brings well over 100 years of expertise in sports.

  • Host John Martin interviews the nation's leading entrepreneurs and small biz experts to educate small business owners on how to be successful. Past guests have included Emeril Lagasse and Guy Kawasaki.

  • The Movie Geeks share their passion for the art through interviews with the stars of and creative minds behind your favorite flicks and pay tribute to big-screen legends. From James Cameron and Francis Ford Coppola to Ellen Burstyn and Robert Duvall, The Geeks have got'em all.

  • Sylvia Global presents global conversations pertaining to women, wealth, business, faith and philanthropy. Sylvia has interviewed an eclectic mix from CEOs and musicians to fashion designers and philanthropists including Randolph Duke and Ne-Yo.

  • Seasoned entertainment reporter Robin Milling gets up close and personal with the world's most compelling celebs. From Michael Douglas to Katie Holmes to Kevin Kline to Ashley Judd to America Ferrera, she sits down in person each week with each and every A-lister.

  • Mr. Media host Bob Andelman goes one-on-one with the hottest, most influential minds from the worlds of film, TV, music, comedy, journalism and literature. That means A-listers like Kirk Douglas, Christian Slater, Kathy Ireland, Rick Fox, Chris Hansen and Jackie Collins.

  • Paula Begoun, best-selling author of Don't Go to the Cosmetics Counter Without Me, separates fact from fiction on achieving a radiant, youthful complexion at any age. She?s regularly joined by health and beauty experts who offer the latest on keeping your skin in tip-top shape.

  • Source: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/ucea/2012/10/22/hanne-b-mawhinney-ucea-ec-2012-candidate-interview

    limbaugh aaron smith wilt chamberlain joe arpaio cat in the hat green eggs and ham wiz khalifa and amber rose

    Big Ben always likes it in Cincy

    Steelers have no road wins so far, and Roethlisberger is 7-1 in the Bengals' house

    Opinion

    By Greg Bedard

    NBCSports.com contributor

    updated 10:54 a.m. ET Oct. 21, 2012

    Greg Bedard

    The Steelers travel to Paul Brown Stadium on Sunday night to take on the Bengals, but it might as well be a home game for Pittsburgh.

    The Steelers are 11-2 in Cincinnati since the stadium opened in 2000. Quarterback Ben Roethlisberger, a native of Findlay, Ohio, is 14-1 in games in his home state, including 7-1 in Cincinnati.

    This time, however, the Steelers (2-3) are desperate for a victory. They have yet to win on the road this season, are coming off an embarrassing 26-23 loss to the Titans, and this is their first game in the AFC North, where they already trail the 5-1 Ravens by 2 ? games.

    The Steelers aren?t afraid to put pressure on themselves entering this game.

    ?I?ve been there in December, praying for four teams to lose, and we don?t want to be in that,? linebacker Larry Foote said. ?We still control our destiny. ... It?s a divisional opponent, and we?ve got to get this win, whatever it takes.?

    The Bengals (3-3) aren?t exactly coming in on a roll. They lost to the previously winless Browns 34-24, thanks to two pick sixes from quarterback Andy Dalton.

    That sets the scene for the showdown. Let?s look at the three keys for each team.

    Steelers
    1. Protect Roethlisberger:
    Well, at least reasonably well. Roethlisberger has taken a beating for years behind the Steelers line, but he?s so big and moves around so well in the pocket that he minimizes the impact, and actually makes huge plays down the field when the protection breaks down. The Steelers have injury issues on the line. Right tackle Marcus Gilbert (ankle) is out, and rookie Mike Adams will make his first start and have to square off against Carlos Dunlap. Standout center Maurkice Pouncey is questionable with a knee injury ? he played one snap against the Titans ? and would be replaced by Doug Legursky. Left tackle Max Starks is off to a bad start and will have his hands full against end Michael Johnson, who has six sacks on the season. The entire Bengals line is solid. Tackle Geno Atkins is tied for the team lead with six sacks and is stout against the run. If the Steelers can give Roethlisberger enough time, he?ll be able to make plays against a poor Bengals secondary.

    2. Stop A.J. Green: Green may be the best overall receiver in the game. He leads the league with 628 receiving yards and has caught a touchdown in five straight games. He will again face Steelers cornerback Ike Taylor, who has not rebounded after giving up the game-winning touchdown against the Broncos in the playoffs. But Taylor and the Steelers did a respectable job last year against Green, though he caught a touchdown in each matchup. He caught just one ball in the first game and six for 86 yards in the second. The Steelers got physical with Green at the line and tried to reroute him constantly. Because of their zone blitz scheme, Green will likely have opportunities against the safeties. Ryan Clark has played very well, but Ryan Mundy (in for the injured Troy Polamalu) can be had if the Bengals can get Green matched up against him.

    3. Force Dalton into mistakes: Bengals quarterback Andy Dalton is tied for second in the league with nine interceptions and has had four returned for touchdowns the past two seasons. Because Dalton doesn?t have a big arm, he has to rely on his accuracy and his anticipation. Both have been issues at times this year, so expect Steelers defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau to try to scheme up a number of disguises and pressures. Dalton is also taking a lot of sacks.

    Bengals
    1. Get Roethlisberger down:
    Like a lot of teams, the Bengals and defensive coordinator Mike Zimmer have had success getting to Roethlisberger. The problem is getting him to the turf. The Bengals haven?t done that well enough, and they?ve paid the price. The Steelers have dangerous weapons in receivers Mike Wallace and Antonio Brown, and tight end Heath Miller has played very well of late. That could be trouble against a Bengals secondary that has had issues outside of safety Reggie Nelson. They?ve produced only two interceptions, which is the same number that Roethlisberger has thrown all season.

    2. Run the ball: The BenJarvus Green-Ellis era got off to a good start when he averaged 5.1 yards per game against the Ravens in the opening game, but the former Patriot hasn?t been over 4.0 since. The Bengals have yet to produce a 100-yard runner so far this season ? as a team they?ve gained 100 just twice ? and that?s putting too much pressure on Dalton to be perfect. Last year the Bengals averaged 111.1 yards per game on the way to the playoffs. The Bengals need a complementary running game to give Dalton the space off play action to make some throws. The Steelers are tied for 17th allowing 4.1 yards per rush, so the Bengals will have opportunities on the ground.

    3. Play even, at least, on special teams: The Bengals gave up a 60-yard punt return to Josh Cribbs of the Browns last week, and Bengals kickoff returner Brandon Tate couldn?t get the ball out to the 20-yard line. That?s not a good sign as the Bengals face a team they?ve struggled against on special teams. In 2010 at Cincinnati, the Bengals had a punt blocked, fumbled a kickoff and missed two field goals. In last year?s matchup in Pittsburgh, Antonio Brown returned a punt for a touchdown, a field goal was blocked and Tate fumbled a kickoff. The Bengals have to be better than that to emerge with a victory.

    ? 2012 NBC Sports.com? Reprints

    advertisement

    Kacsmar: Don't believe hype with Steelers' D

    Kacsmar: Known as the father of the zone blitz, which creates illusions of pressure, Dick LeBeau has also created an illusion that his long career is full of defensive coaching success. That's not the case.

    Source: http://nbcsports.msnbc.com/id/49488359/ns/sports-nfl/

    white house correspondents dinner phoenix coyotes bruce irvin charlie st cloud celtics josh hamilton nba playoffs

    Kitchen Remodeling Cost | Concierge Home Improvement

    It can be expensive to remodel your kitchen. There are ways that you can save with kitchen remodeling cost.

    Start with your custom kitchen cabinets NJ. You want your kitchen cabinets replaced completely? Can you hire someone to stain your kitchen cabinets? If you really want them replaced, make sure that you hire a professional to do the job. You do not want to try to do it yourself and end up with crooked kitchen cabinets. You must either live with the error or hire a professional to fix your kitchen remodeling jobs. When a professional remodeling solve the problem, it may end up costing you more in the long term if the professional did the job in the first place, you save money and headaches.

    If you want to wallpaper the walls making it much easier to hire a professional. Many professionals have simply steam the wallpaper off the wall. Then, the professional can easily peel the wallpaper off the wall.

    You can choose to have someone to put new wallpaper or paint your kitchen when you are remodeling the kitchen. Choose the color of wallpaper or paint or paint colors and gives work to a professional. You can have the time to do your work or save your time for yourself.

    Perhaps you have saved some money remodeling your kitchen by replacing only the front area of your kitchen cabinet. Now you have more money to spend on your floors. You can choose to have carpet put in your kitchen. Make sure you clean up spills before they stain your carpet. Should also be shampooed carpet from time to time by you or a professional?

    You may decide that you want wood flooring installed in your kitchen. You can choose to have real wood or laminate wood flooring installed in your kitchen. If you have a dog or dogs, make sure you choose a solid wood such as oak. The dog nails scratch wood floors and you need a hardwood. If you have young children, you should choose a solid wood flooring as well. Many toys down on the kitchen floor and other accidents. Laminate wood flooring is also a cheaper flooring and excellent for families with pets. Laminated is difficult to scratch and dent.

    You can change the look of your kitchen by replacing the chandelier. If you are remodeling your kitchen modern country, a new luster to day will help do the trick.

    Kitchen remodeling cost is quite expensive, but there are several ways you can have a beautiful kitchen of your dreams without breaking the bank.

    Source: http://provider-concierge.com/kitchen-remodeling-cost/

    guild wars 2 adrian gonzalez Jerry Nelson Foo Canoodle Isaac path Tropical Storm Isaac path

    Feds dig for dirt on SoCal landscaper pay compliance ? Business ...

    The U.S. Department of Labor?s Wage and Hour Division (WHD) is targeting Southern California?s landscape industry, looking for contractors and subcontractors that pay workers less than minimum wage. In particular, they?re looking for landscapers that shortchange workers who cut the grass and mulch the flowerbeds on public property, such as city parks and along roadsides.

    Based on WHD investigations in 2010 and 2011, as many as 77% of South??ern California landscape companies working for government entities may violate the Fair Labor Stand??ards Act. The feds estimate that more than 6,000 workers may be owed more than $4.8 million in back pay.

    WHD says investigators will stage surprise inspections of contractor premises and work sites to review employment practices and pay rec??ords. They will also interview em??ployees. If they find violations, cases will be referred to local, state and federal agencies for enforcement.

    Like what you've read? ...Republish it and share great business tips!

    Attention: Readers, Publishers, Editors, Bloggers, Media, Webmasters and more...

    We believe great content should be read and passed around. After all, knowledge IS power. And good business can become great with the right information at their fingertips. If you'd like to share any of the insightful articles on BusinessManagementDaily.com, you may republish or syndicate it without charge.

    The only thing we ask is that you keep the article exactly as it was written and formatted. You also need to include an attribution statement and link to the article.

    " This information is proudly provided by Business Management Daily.com: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/33001/feds-dig-for-dirt-on-socal-landscaper-pay-compliance "

    Source: http://www.businessmanagementdaily.com/33001/feds-dig-for-dirt-on-socal-landscaper-pay-compliance

    new york giants hot wings recipe 7 layer dip recipe chris carter superbowl 2012 kickoff time what time is the super bowl 2012 nfl mvp

    'Paranormal Activity 4': Five Reasons To See It

    From crafty characters to a big twist, MTV News tells you why you should watch the newest found-footage film.
    By Kevin P. Sullivan


    Kathryn Newton in the "Paranormal Activity 4"
    Photo: Paramount Pictures

    Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1695891/paranormal-activity-4-reasons-to-watch.jhtml

    andrej pejic naomi watts macaulay culkin steve jobs fbi safehouse brown recluse brown recluse

    No. 5 Notre Dame beats BYU 17-14 behind Riddick

    Notre Dame linebacker Manti Te'o celebrates after an interception against the BYU during the first half of an NCAA college football game in South Bend, Ind., Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

    Notre Dame linebacker Manti Te'o celebrates after an interception against the BYU during the first half of an NCAA college football game in South Bend, Ind., Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

    Notre Dame tight end Tyler Eifert , left, makes a catch over BYU defensive back Preston Hadley for a touchdown during the first half of an NCAA college football game in South Bend, Ind., Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

    BYU running back Jamaal Williams (21) is knocked out-of-bounds after a 21-yard gain by Notre Dame safety Matthias Farley, right, and defensive end Sheldon Day during the first half of an NCAA college football game in South Bend, Ind., Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

    Notre Dame defensive end Kapron Lewis-Moore, left, sacks BYU quarterback Riley Nelson during the first half of an NCAA college football game in South Bend, Ind., Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

    Brigham Young wide receiver Ross Apo (1) is knocked out of bounds at the 2-yard line by Notre Dame safety Zeke Motta during the first half of an NCAA college football game in South Bend, Ind., Saturday, Oct. 20, 2012. (AP Photo/Michael Conroy)

    (AP) ? Theo Riddick pounded his way for a career-high 143 yards and Cierre Wood added 114 yards as fifth-ranked Notre Dame overpowered a Brigham Young defense that entered the game third in the nation against the run, earning a 17-14 victory on Saturday.

    Riddick had runs of 55 and 27, the two longest rushes of his career, to pace Notre Dame (7-0), which is off to its best start in a decade and has a big game ahead against No. 10 Oklahoma next week. The Cougars (4-4) fell to 0-3 on the road as they surrendered a season-high 270 yards rushing.

    Backup quarterback Tommy Rees, starting in place of injured Everett Golson, completed 6 of 7 passes in the first quarter for 86 yards and a touchdown, throwing four of those to Tyler Eifert. But Rees missed his next seven passes and the Irish attempted only three passes in the second half.

    Rees' only completion of the second half was a 31-yard pass to TJ Jones with a little more than a minute left in the third quarter. Riddick ran the ball up the middle for 19 yards to the BYU 5. Three plays later, George Atkinson III scored on an end around, cutting inside BYU safety Joe Sampson for the touchdown to give the Irish the 17-14 lead.

    BYU had a chance to regain the lead on the next possession after an Irish penalty. On a third-and-16 from the BYU 10, the Irish stopped BYU quartereback Riley Nelson. But nose guard Louis Nix III was called for grabbing Nelson's face mask.

    The Cougars drove to the Notre Dame 31, but Nelson was sacked for a 9 yard loss. Moments earlier Cody Hoffman was wide open for what would have probably been a touchdown, but Nelson's pass wasn't close.

    Nelson was 23-of-36 passing for 177 yards with two interceptions and two TD passes.

    On Riddick's 55-yard run from the 37-yard line, he ran into a pile at the line of scrimmage, put his hand down to keep his balance and then broke out of the pack before being caught by cornerback Jordan Johnson at the 8-yard line. But the Irish ran three straight running plays for a gain of 1 yard and had to settle for a 24-yard field goal by Kyle Brindza to cut BYU's lead to 14-10 late in the third quarter.

    Brigham Young took advantage of Notre Dame mistakes to open a 14-7 halftime lead. After going 17 quarters without giving up an offensive touchdown, Notre Dame gave up two in a span of 2:18. Jamaal Williams set up the first score, rushing for 43 yards on five straight carries. He was thrown to the ground out of bounds on the final 21-yard run and Notre Dame safety Matthias Farley was called for a personal foul.

    On third-and-goal, Nelson threw a touchdown pass to Hoffman, who was wide open in the back of the end zone after three Irish defenders covered receiver JD Falslev. That touchdown ended a streak of Notre Dame holding opponents without a touchdown on 11 straight drives into the red zone.

    BYU got the ball back three plays later when a pass from Rees bounced off the hands of DaVaris Daniels, deflected up and was intercepted by Kyle Van Noy, who returned the ball to the Notre Dame 30. After Notre linebacker Daniel Spond was called for holding, Riley ran the ball for an 8-yard gain to the Notre Dame 12. After a 10-yard pass to Ross Apo, Nelson then threw a 2-yard TD pass that Kaneakua Friel caught as he went to the ground.

    Notre Dame had a chance to tie the score late in the half after Riddick's 27-yard run, breaking two tackles and carrying three BYU defenders for the final 10 yards to the BYU 14. But the drive stalled and Brindza missed a 28-yard field goal wide right. He missed a 40-yard field goal on Notre Dame's opening drive of the game.

    Notre Dame dominated the first quarter statistically, outgaining the Cougars 120 yards to 40, but led only 7-0. The Irish scored on Rees' 4-yard TD pass to Tyler Eifert.

    Associated Press

    Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/347875155d53465d95cec892aeb06419/Article_2012-10-20-T25-BYU-Notre%20Dame/id-cbe80f43cada41cf8d4b8c36cc13abf0

    Azarenka NFL fantasy football Chris Kluwe Jennifer Granholm Tulane player injured frank ocean fox sports